Yaris, Scion xD, Honda Fit - no water temp gauge

Discussion in 'Fit' started by bubbabubbs, Apr 4, 2008.

  1. bubbabubbs

    Elle Guest

    It's true that, on average, females are more ignorant of
    things electrical and mechanical. But in general, I think
    the females are more willing to admit their ignorance. (Plus
    society is easier on a female ignorant of cars.) I think
    this means the females are more inclined to do something
    meaningful when the CEL comes on. Males (not you nor anyone
    here) OTOH can be overconfident--they'll second guess the
    computer, say, and will drive the car to ruin.

    Elle
    "Don't drive like my brother." His car's low oil pressure
    light came on. He continued to drive the car until the
    engine seized and all he had left was a massive paperweight.
     
    Elle, Apr 28, 2008
  2. "One" is singular. "They" is plural.

    One should reap what he sows.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Apr 28, 2008

  3. Elmo, I gotta take issue here.

    For example, everyone should know the four basic functions of math;
    addition, subtractionn, multiplication and division.[/QUOTE]

    "Should" is the operative word here.

    But many DON'T--and it's certainly not a requirement for buying and
    licensing a car for driving on public roads.

    In fact, the sales staff at a dealership would tell you that it only
    gets in the way of their goal--which is to get a signature on the bottom
    line.

    Same with gauges.

    The buying public has spoken: it wants to "keep it real".
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Apr 28, 2008
  4. Shoot, even Nate's vaunted German engineering has brought us the BMW
    engine without an oil dipstick, because the computer is taking care of
    that for you.

    I'm guessing the computer IS doing a better job of watching a bunch of
    parameters than any driver could do.

    Do we need the "check engine" light to light up green, yellow, and red
    to indicate the severity of the issue? Yes. But that's a tweak to the
    design, and is no reason to throw the entire design out.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Apr 28, 2008
  5. Um, the Germans actually put the gauges in to be used in the home
    market.[/QUOTE]

    Does the home market BMW also get an oil dipstick? Or does the home
    market suffer from a lack of that just like the US market does?
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Apr 28, 2008
  6. bubbabubbs

    Brent P Guest

    Does the home market BMW also get an oil dipstick? Or does the home
    market suffer from a lack of that just like the US market does?[/QUOTE]

    They stupidly did what you suggest and went to a computer controlled
    gizmo for oil level.
     
    Brent P, Apr 28, 2008
  7. They stupidly did what you suggest and went to a computer controlled
    gizmo for oil level.[/QUOTE]

    which, when combined with their warranty terms, tells me that they have
    programmed this system very carefully.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Apr 29, 2008
  8. bubbabubbs

    Nate Nagel Guest


    which, when combined with their warranty terms, tells me that they have
    programmed this system very carefully.
    [/QUOTE]

    yes, if you read the maintenance schedule for a new BMW, it is basically
    what everyone should do to any car that they want to keep running
    indefinitely but nobody ever does.

    This would make me much more likely to consider a used BMW with service
    records to be more valuable than other brands. Unfortunately other
    people seem to agree with me, as even a "certified pre-owned" 3-series
    is a little too rich for my blood.

    I still don't like the computerization of something as simple as a
    dipstick, although I can understand that if they want to take the brand
    more upscale, a hood that is essentially sealed from the perspective of
    the end user might be a good thing (note: not this particular end user.
    And don't hide all the pretty stuff under plastic, either. If you
    want to do something fancy, polish the cam cover, and give me some shiny
    stainless headers.)

    I do *not* trust American manufacturers to take the same care in
    programming that BMW's engineers apparently have done. Sorry, I just
    don't trust 'em.

    nate
     
    Nate Nagel, Apr 29, 2008
  9. I trust the Japanese systems even more.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Apr 29, 2008
  10. bubbabubbs

    Scott Dorsey Guest

    Not any more. It's been totally changed since BMW started offering free
    maintenance during the warranty period.

    BMW extended the oil and coolant changes considerably, and is now claiming
    the transmission fluid is "lifetime fill." Depending on the vehicle they
    may not be recommending brake fluid changes at all, and they certainly are
    not recommending them annually the way they used to.

    It is shameful. Far more so than the stupid fake temperature gauge and
    the missing dipstick.
    Look into some older ones. You can find mid-eighties BMWs in decent
    shape at reasonable prices, and if they have been well-maintained they
    are good drivers. Parts are fairly expensive for them, but working on
    them is an absolute joy... everything just fits together perfectly without
    hammering and prying.
    BMW's marketing in the US is totally different than their marketing in
    Europe. But they are losing sight of their old core buyers, people who
    wanted a vehicle that was fun to drive. The newer BMWs, though they have
    considerable sophistication and a lot more fancy modern features, are not
    as much fun to drive.
    That's okay, I don't trust BMW's engineers either.
    --scott
     
    Scott Dorsey, Apr 29, 2008
  11. Not any more. It's been totally changed since BMW started offering free
    maintenance during the warranty period.

    BMW extended the oil and coolant changes considerably, and is now claiming
    the transmission fluid is "lifetime fill."[/QUOTE]

    Yeah--the lifetime of the transmission, no doubt. "When the
    transmission goes, you rebuild it and put new fluid in." Right.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Apr 29, 2008

  12. Heh... I'll betcha that he also won't ask for dirctions when he's
    lost......

    <G>

    JT
     
    Grumpy AuContraire, Apr 29, 2008
  13. bubbabubbs

    N8N Guest

    That is sad. I remember the maintenance schedule for my old 535i;
    applied to just about any car it would have guaranteed several decades
    of good service and reliability.
    Eh, I'm not in the market for a vehicle, and the 944 suits me fine.
    If what you say above is true, I'm inclined to agree, sadly. I also
    heard that the iDrive system was based on Windows CE, true?

    nate
     
    N8N, Apr 29, 2008
  14. bubbabubbs

    Scott Dorsey Guest

    It is. Possibly I am driving your old 535i right now, if it's a 1985
    model. It's only got 280,000 miles on it so far, though, which is less than
    half that of the 2002.
    It's more fun to work on than the 944. There's actually room inside the
    engine compartment, for one thing. You need one. And you won't get out
    of your seat to find your foot has punched through the floorboard like you
    will on the 944.
    I don't know at all. I have never used Windows CE, but I cannot imagine
    the user interface on it can be as bad as iDrive. It's hard to imagine ANY
    user interface as poorly thought-out. But then, I am a big fan of having
    one control per function whenever possible.
    --scott
     
    Scott Dorsey, Apr 29, 2008
  15. bubbabubbs

    N8N Guest

    No, it was an '86. I sold it back around 1999 or so with a little
    over 200K miles on it. I'd just had the engine replaced with a
    junkyard motor, but it had some electronic issue (probably flywheel
    sensors?) that would shut it down whenever it got hot, and the
    suspension was worn out and I didn't have the $$ to get it in shape to
    pass VA safety inspection. (was moving from OH to VA) I do miss it
    at times but my particular car wasn't in the greatest of shape,
    although the dark grey exterior/red interior was surprisingly
    attractive and it was cosmetically very nice.
    I no longer live in the rust belt :) and Porsche seemed to finally
    figure out rustproofing sometime in the mid-70s AFAICT.
    I agree, I am not enamored of either the concept or the execution.

    nate
     
    N8N, Apr 29, 2008
  16. bubbabubbs

    Comboverfish Guest

    (Just saw this post over a week late...)

    I'm sorry, but which Toyota would that be that has an annoying upshift
    light? Seems that's more of an 80's piece of crap domestic brand kind
    of thing.

    Toyota MDT in MO
     
    Comboverfish, Apr 30, 2008
  17. bubbabubbs

    Comboverfish Guest

    I don't know about your memory getting bad, because I have yet to see
    one either. Of course I didn't drive in the 80's, but have seen many
    an 80-up between working at home and being in the dealer for so long.
    It would be difficult to substantiate short of a well kept owner's
    manual or an actual model still up and running. They've been long
    gone from salty snowy MO for some time now.

    Toyota MDT in MO
     
    Comboverfish, Apr 30, 2008
  18. bubbabubbs

    Ray O Guest

    I don't know about your memory getting bad, because I have yet to see
    one either. Of course I didn't drive in the 80's, but have seen many
    an 80-up between working at home and being in the dealer for so long.
    It would be difficult to substantiate short of a well kept owner's
    manual or an actual model still up and running. They've been long
    gone from salty snowy MO for some time now.

    Toyota MDT in MO

    **********
    It's good to know that my memory wasn't THAT bad! An upshift light is
    something that would have been pointed out in the New Car Features, and
    since I am not a fan of such lights, I thought I would have remembered it.
    The poster must have been thinking about his VW or something.

    Welcome back!
     
    Ray O, May 1, 2008
  19. bubbabubbs

    Steve Guest

    God you're dumb.

    I've already given you two instances, one by a COMPLETE NON-TECHNICAL
    driver (my wife) where a gauge saved an engine.

    And in the other case where I (an engineer) was able to detect a failed
    filter by abnormal (but still technically in-spec) pressure behavior.

    Debate over, proof presented, no question remaining.
     
    Steve, May 4, 2008
  20. bubbabubbs

    Steve Guest

    That's what Steve and his narrow-minded people want. They don't
    understand the REAL world in which the typical car buyer lives.
    [/QUOTE]

    IT always goes to hell when the Honda and Toyota fools invade a
    technical discussion.

    No, "Steve" never said that. YOU said that engineers prefer
    oversimplification, and I (correctly) pointeed out that most engineers
    will err on the side of over instrumentation. My PERSONAL claim was
    that 4 basic drivetrain instruments are needed to keep a car reasonably
    safe: voltage or current, oil pressure, water temperature, and fuel level.

    With such SIMPLE instrumentation needs, WHY THE BLOODY HELL is the
    motivation for further over-simplification? And even if further
    simplification makes some kind of economic sense to the manufacturer
    (presumbably because they save a few cents per vehicle and sell a few
    more vehicles when an engine roasts because the idiot light said "too
    late, you're screwed), why would ANYONE with enough interest in cars to
    read R.A.T. actually PREFER a dumbed-down car to one with basic
    instrumentation? It wouldn't keep me from buying a car if it only had an
    idiot light, but you guys act like you'd turn down a car with 3 gauges!

    And by your argument, we should just eliminate the damn fuel gauge too.
    Put a warning light on and call it good.

    Sheesh.
     
    Steve, May 4, 2008
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.