Volkswagon unveils car that gets 282 miles to the gallon.

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Useful Info, May 21, 2007.

  1. Useful Info

    Eeyore Guest

    There isn't one.

    It seems to be discouragement through regulation.

    Graham
     
    Eeyore, May 22, 2007
    #81
  2. Useful Info

    Eeyore Guest

    There isn't one.

    It seems to be discouragement through regulation.

    Graham
     
    Eeyore, May 22, 2007
    #82
  3. Useful Info

    Eeyore Guest

    The last one I recall making any oil change requirement was a high-end 1970
    model.

    I should have said that oil level checks are a maintenance requirement of
    course.

    Graham
     
    Eeyore, May 22, 2007
    #83
  4. Useful Info

    Eeyore Guest

    The last one I recall making any oil change requirement was a high-end 1970
    model.

    I should have said that oil level checks are a maintenance requirement of
    course.

    Graham
     
    Eeyore, May 22, 2007
    #84
  5. I'm not the one you need to convince. Emissions and safety regulations in
    the US are nearly as old as I am. The US tort system almost requires safety
    regs; if you are driving a vehicle with inadequate side impact protection
    and Elmer Fudd t-bones your vehicle because he wasn't watching where he was
    chasing that wascally wabbit, should he be responsible for the increased
    injury to you that stems from the substandard design?

    But 120-150 mpg diesel hybrids? I'm not familiar with anything like that. VW
    made the Lupo 3L using all the tricks to get the fuel consumption down to 3
    liters per 100km, barely half the 150 mpg claim, and hybridization isn't
    likely to improve on that. Stupid laws of physics.

    The public everywhere is going to have to adjust to a cruel fact of
    transportation: not all the energy is used to get from point A to point B.
    Cooling and heating, and even lighting, take an increasing toll as the
    energy expenditures for travel decrease. Hybrid owners are already
    complaining.

    Mike
     
    Michael Pardee, May 22, 2007
    #85
  6. I'm not the one you need to convince. Emissions and safety regulations in
    the US are nearly as old as I am. The US tort system almost requires safety
    regs; if you are driving a vehicle with inadequate side impact protection
    and Elmer Fudd t-bones your vehicle because he wasn't watching where he was
    chasing that wascally wabbit, should he be responsible for the increased
    injury to you that stems from the substandard design?

    But 120-150 mpg diesel hybrids? I'm not familiar with anything like that. VW
    made the Lupo 3L using all the tricks to get the fuel consumption down to 3
    liters per 100km, barely half the 150 mpg claim, and hybridization isn't
    likely to improve on that. Stupid laws of physics.

    The public everywhere is going to have to adjust to a cruel fact of
    transportation: not all the energy is used to get from point A to point B.
    Cooling and heating, and even lighting, take an increasing toll as the
    energy expenditures for travel decrease. Hybrid owners are already
    complaining.

    Mike
     
    Michael Pardee, May 22, 2007
    #86
  7. Useful Info

    Brian Smith Guest

    Trucks are heavier and by your statement below indicates, safer.
    Trucks aren't scary, people who think trucks are scary are scary.
    The only part of your post that is correct.
     
    Brian Smith, May 22, 2007
    #87
  8. Useful Info

    Brian Smith Guest

    Trucks are heavier and by your statement below indicates, safer.
    Trucks aren't scary, people who think trucks are scary are scary.
    The only part of your post that is correct.
     
    Brian Smith, May 22, 2007
    #88
  9. Now we come full circle - the OP is naked spam to get us to visit the
    *really* wacked site this spam is advertising. The same spam appears in
    nearly every auto forum, in different cross-posted blocks.

    Mike

    "We never walked on the moon, Elvis ain't dead, you ain't goin' crazy, it's
    all in your head."
     
    Michael Pardee, May 22, 2007
    #89
  10. Now we come full circle - the OP is naked spam to get us to visit the
    *really* wacked site this spam is advertising. The same spam appears in
    nearly every auto forum, in different cross-posted blocks.

    Mike

    "We never walked on the moon, Elvis ain't dead, you ain't goin' crazy, it's
    all in your head."
     
    Michael Pardee, May 22, 2007
    #90

  11. If push comes to shove, the heavier vehicle will suffer less damage than
    the lighter should the two tango.

    Quite frankly, I feel a whole lot safer in my 1955 Studebaker President
    with seat belts than I do in my 1983 Civic.

    JT
     
    Grumpy AuContraire, May 23, 2007
    #91

  12. If push comes to shove, the heavier vehicle will suffer less damage than
    the lighter should the two tango.

    Quite frankly, I feel a whole lot safer in my 1955 Studebaker President
    with seat belts than I do in my 1983 Civic.

    JT
     
    Grumpy AuContraire, May 23, 2007
    #92
  13. Heh heh... I tell friends with modern plastic that the only thing soft
    on my 1964 Studebaker T-Cab are the tires and that I take advantage of
    other's crush zones...

    Absolutely! That's why I have no qualms driving an older Civic.

    JT
     
    Grumpy AuContraire, May 23, 2007
    #93
  14. Heh heh... I tell friends with modern plastic that the only thing soft
    on my 1964 Studebaker T-Cab are the tires and that I take advantage of
    other's crush zones...

    Absolutely! That's why I have no qualms driving an older Civic.

    JT
     
    Grumpy AuContraire, May 23, 2007
    #94

  15. Not to mention the fire bomb characteristics of the current crop of cop
    cars..

    JT
     
    Grumpy AuContraire, May 23, 2007
    #95

  16. Not to mention the fire bomb characteristics of the current crop of cop
    cars..

    JT
     
    Grumpy AuContraire, May 23, 2007
    #96
  17. Useful Info

    EdV Guest

    google the opel eco-speedster, its more realistic than the this VW.
     
    EdV, May 23, 2007
    #97
  18. Useful Info

    EdV Guest

    google the opel eco-speedster, its more realistic than the this VW.
     
    EdV, May 23, 2007
    #98
  19. Useful Info

    someone Guest

    toyo reccomend 60k miles on my supra. i did it when i bought
    it, i'm sure the fluid had never been changed before that.
    love the toy 5 speed and mine is slick and easy.
     
    someone, May 23, 2007
    #99
  20. Useful Info

    someone Guest

    toyo reccomend 60k miles on my supra. i did it when i bought
    it, i'm sure the fluid had never been changed before that.
    love the toy 5 speed and mine is slick and easy.
     
    someone, May 23, 2007
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.