Tegger's 'Teg passes another emissions test!

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Tegger, May 6, 2009.

  1. Tegger

    Tegger Guest

    With 321,000 miles on it.

    That aftermarket Walker-brand cat is working much better than I expected it
    to. Check out the NO number especially.

    Results here:
    <http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/91_integra_emissions.html>
     
    Tegger, May 6, 2009
    #1
  2. Tegger

    Tony Harding Guest

    Congrats, Tegger!
     
    Tony Harding, May 7, 2009
    #2
  3. Tegger

    Tony Harding Guest

    Congrats, Tegger!
     
    Tony Harding, May 7, 2009
    #3
  4. Tegger

    Tegger Guest


    I was happy. I'm off the hook for two more years.

    The Walker has been on the car for something close to 20,000 miles, and I
    was honestly not expecting it to actually be functioning by the time smog
    came around.

    My primary issue with the Walker is the horribly loud ticking that it and
    its spring bolts make ALL THE TIME. I let the mechanic (not my usual guy)
    talk me into an aftermarket Walker A-pipe because he said the two would
    mate better than an OEM A-pipe and a Walker cat. BAD choice. The damned
    assembly is noisy as all get-out. I almost want to smear that stupid A-pipe
    with salt and chlorine in order to get it to rust out really fast so I can
    justify the cost of a new OEM A-pipe and bolts.
     
    Tegger, May 8, 2009
    #4
  5. Tegger

    Tegger Guest


    I was happy. I'm off the hook for two more years.

    The Walker has been on the car for something close to 20,000 miles, and I
    was honestly not expecting it to actually be functioning by the time smog
    came around.

    My primary issue with the Walker is the horribly loud ticking that it and
    its spring bolts make ALL THE TIME. I let the mechanic (not my usual guy)
    talk me into an aftermarket Walker A-pipe because he said the two would
    mate better than an OEM A-pipe and a Walker cat. BAD choice. The damned
    assembly is noisy as all get-out. I almost want to smear that stupid A-pipe
    with salt and chlorine in order to get it to rust out really fast so I can
    justify the cost of a new OEM A-pipe and bolts.
     
    Tegger, May 8, 2009
    #5
  6. Always good to see these reports. I make a mental note and then often
    end up groups.google searching for some of Tegger's updates somewhere
    down the line.

    One interesting point to me: His Integra is passing smog with an 8-
    year-old, 146k miles O2 sensor. I had almost talked myself into
    replacing these every 50k miles, based on some suspicions on why my 91
    Civic a few months ago could not get past smog.
     
    honda.lioness, May 9, 2009
    #6
  7. Always good to see these reports. I make a mental note and then often
    end up groups.google searching for some of Tegger's updates somewhere
    down the line.

    One interesting point to me: His Integra is passing smog with an 8-
    year-old, 146k miles O2 sensor. I had almost talked myself into
    replacing these every 50k miles, based on some suspicions on why my 91
    Civic a few months ago could not get past smog.
     
    honda.lioness, May 9, 2009
    #7
  8. Tegger

    Tegger Guest

    wrote in :


    This was interesting to me as well because I did have considerable concern
    about the oxygen sensor before this test.

    The original sensor was replaced on account of the Check Engine light
    having come on twice with a Code 1 in the months before the first test.

    The current replacement sensor has not yet tripped any codes, but it's
    getting very close to the mileage where the original sensor began to give
    trouble.

    Maybe Denso has improved their sensors since 1991. And maybe the newer
    gasoline is formulated to be kinder to oxygen sensors. The original sensor
    spent all of its life in the presence of MMT, which can cause deposits on
    certain emissions control hardware. The new sensor has seen little MMT.




    I've seen numerous recommendations both on and off-line that sensors should
    be replaced every 60K as a matter of course. But at over $300 for new OEM
    Denso, it seems to me that ours ought to last quite a lot longer than 60K.
    And it seems like they do exceed that figure by a considerable distance.

    Did you ever post your numbers when the Civic wouldn't pass?
     
    Tegger, May 10, 2009
    #8
  9. Tegger

    Tegger Guest

    wrote in :


    This was interesting to me as well because I did have considerable concern
    about the oxygen sensor before this test.

    The original sensor was replaced on account of the Check Engine light
    having come on twice with a Code 1 in the months before the first test.

    The current replacement sensor has not yet tripped any codes, but it's
    getting very close to the mileage where the original sensor began to give
    trouble.

    Maybe Denso has improved their sensors since 1991. And maybe the newer
    gasoline is formulated to be kinder to oxygen sensors. The original sensor
    spent all of its life in the presence of MMT, which can cause deposits on
    certain emissions control hardware. The new sensor has seen little MMT.




    I've seen numerous recommendations both on and off-line that sensors should
    be replaced every 60K as a matter of course. But at over $300 for new OEM
    Denso, it seems to me that ours ought to last quite a lot longer than 60K.
    And it seems like they do exceed that figure by a considerable distance.

    Did you ever post your numbers when the Civic wouldn't pass?
     
    Tegger, May 10, 2009
    #9
  10. Tegger

    z Guest

    Oh sure, lord it over us who can't get passed.

    Well, now that spring is here, I'll start diagnosing my O2 sensor.
    Maybe even risk the cash to replace it blindly.
     
    z, May 10, 2009
    #10
  11. Tegger

    z Guest

    Oh sure, lord it over us who can't get passed.

    Well, now that spring is here, I'll start diagnosing my O2 sensor.
    Maybe even risk the cash to replace it blindly.
     
    z, May 10, 2009
    #11
  12. For my 91 Civic and now 93 Civic, I can get the new OEM Denso oxygen
    sensor through Amazon for about $30. www.densoproducts.com is almost
    as competitive.
    No. I had it tested several times. Mostly it failed at idle but not at
    high speed. The last reading before I sold my 91 Civic (to people
    living in a no emissions testing required county):
    Failed idle with
    HC = 460 (limit is 180)
    CO = 1.8 (limit is 1.2)

    My last theory is that I had air leaks at the throttle body gasket
    (you could hear them using some Tygon tubing as a stethoscope). A
    little Hondabond sealant fixed this. But I think the air leaks may
    have resulted in rich running for so long that the O2 sensor was
    fouled. I did some checking of the O2 sensor and it was not bouncing
    around 0.45 volts the way certain web sites said it should. So my next
    step would have been to put in a new O2 sensor. If a new sensor would
    not fix it, then I think I would have done a compression test and seen
    if the engine was just too old and worn to pass emissions. Miles per
    gallon was still pretty good when I sold it, so it is hard to say.

    At honda-tech.com I think the threads that are left unresolved most
    often are the smog ones for the older Hondas.
     
    honda.lioness, May 12, 2009
    #12
  13. For my 91 Civic and now 93 Civic, I can get the new OEM Denso oxygen
    sensor through Amazon for about $30. www.densoproducts.com is almost
    as competitive.
    No. I had it tested several times. Mostly it failed at idle but not at
    high speed. The last reading before I sold my 91 Civic (to people
    living in a no emissions testing required county):
    Failed idle with
    HC = 460 (limit is 180)
    CO = 1.8 (limit is 1.2)

    My last theory is that I had air leaks at the throttle body gasket
    (you could hear them using some Tygon tubing as a stethoscope). A
    little Hondabond sealant fixed this. But I think the air leaks may
    have resulted in rich running for so long that the O2 sensor was
    fouled. I did some checking of the O2 sensor and it was not bouncing
    around 0.45 volts the way certain web sites said it should. So my next
    step would have been to put in a new O2 sensor. If a new sensor would
    not fix it, then I think I would have done a compression test and seen
    if the engine was just too old and worn to pass emissions. Miles per
    gallon was still pretty good when I sold it, so it is hard to say.

    At honda-tech.com I think the threads that are left unresolved most
    often are the smog ones for the older Hondas.
     
    honda.lioness, May 12, 2009
    #13
  14. Tegger

    Al Reynolds Guest

    Just for comparison, my 97 Accord Wagon EX (185000 miles) just passed its UK
    MOT emissions test again with the following:

    Fast idle test:
    CO 0.09% (limit 0.20%)
    HC 13ppm (limit 200ppm)

    Idle test:
    CO 0.13% (limit 0.30%)

    As you can see, we don't have an NO test, or a 25mph test, or test HC at
    idle, so we're obviously not as fussy. As far as I know the cat and other
    emissions components have not been replaced ever on this car. I get about
    27mpg mostly.

    Nonetheless, I was as happy as ever to pass emissions for another year. The
    only thing I failed on was the two number plate bulbs, which were working
    but "not bright enough"...

    Al Reynolds
     
    Al Reynolds, May 14, 2009
    #14
  15. Tegger

    Al Reynolds Guest

    Just for comparison, my 97 Accord Wagon EX (185000 miles) just passed its UK
    MOT emissions test again with the following:

    Fast idle test:
    CO 0.09% (limit 0.20%)
    HC 13ppm (limit 200ppm)

    Idle test:
    CO 0.13% (limit 0.30%)

    As you can see, we don't have an NO test, or a 25mph test, or test HC at
    idle, so we're obviously not as fussy. As far as I know the cat and other
    emissions components have not been replaced ever on this car. I get about
    27mpg mostly.

    Nonetheless, I was as happy as ever to pass emissions for another year. The
    only thing I failed on was the two number plate bulbs, which were working
    but "not bright enough"...

    Al Reynolds
     
    Al Reynolds, May 14, 2009
    #15
  16. Tegger

    Tegger Guest



    <snip>


    What exactly is "fast idle" as defined by your MoT?
     
    Tegger, May 15, 2009
    #16
  17. Tegger

    Tegger Guest



    <snip>


    What exactly is "fast idle" as defined by your MoT?
     
    Tegger, May 15, 2009
    #17
  18. Tegger

    Al Reynolds Guest


    When you first turn on the car, it idles at about 1500-1800 rpm for a short
    period, and then settles to about 700rpm. The first period is the "fast
    idle" period.

    Al
     
    Al Reynolds, May 16, 2009
    #18
  19. Tegger

    Al Reynolds Guest


    When you first turn on the car, it idles at about 1500-1800 rpm for a short
    period, and then settles to about 700rpm. The first period is the "fast
    idle" period.

    Al
     
    Al Reynolds, May 16, 2009
    #19
  20. Tegger

    Tegger Guest



    At hot idle (when the cat is actually functioning) that initial elevated
    RPM lasts for only two seconds or so, just long enough to get the oil
    pressure up quickly. I'm really surprised they'd try to test you on such a
    short duration.

    AFAIK, no North American jurisdiction attempts such a thing.
     
    Tegger, May 19, 2009
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.