Ridgeline vs. Ram vs. Tundra vs. Titan

Discussion in 'Ridgeline' started by Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!!, Apr 30, 2005.

  1. Which of these would be the best work truck, hauling lumber, etc? Also
    one that can tow 5000lbs up mtns without a problem.
     
    Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!!, Apr 30, 2005
    #1
  2. Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!!

    John Horner Guest

    The Ridgeline is derived from the Honda Minivan/SUV platform and it is not
    really designed for the serious work truck market. The others you
    mentioned are targeted at the heavy work truck market, as are the Ford and
    Chevy/GMC offerings.

    John
     
    John Horner, Apr 30, 2005
    #2
  3. Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!!

    SoCalMike Guest

    ram 3500 crewcab dually with a cummins turbo diesel.

    or an international CXT.
     
    SoCalMike, Apr 30, 2005
    #3
  4. I agree.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Apr 30, 2005
    #4
  5. Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!!

    Nightdude Guest

    Totally clueless. It's NOT derived from the same platform. It has its own.
    Even the engine is a bit different.

    Only issue with the Ridgeline is that it's not made to go into heavy duty
    offroading.
     
    Nightdude, Apr 30, 2005
    #5
  6. Absolutely the Ridgeline comes from the same global platform that
    spawned the Accord, Odyssey, MDX, and Pilot.

    And the engine *is* the same as the Odyssey engine.

    Thanks for playing. Next time, do a little research.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Apr 30, 2005
    #6
  7. Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!!

    John Horner Guest

    I think you need to go back to school Dude.

    Note that I chose my words very carefully. Honda is putting out lots of
    marketing mumbo-jumbo to try and hide the Ridgeline's roots, but it clearly
    is *derived from* the same platform as the Odyssey, Pilot and MDX.

    Honda welded extra reinforcements onto the unibody to kinda-sorta make a
    frame for the vehicle, much like is sometimes done when making coupes and
    sedans into convertibles.

    This is not a ground-up heavy duty pickup truck design such as Nissan did
    when developing the Titan/Armada family.

    Don't get me wrong, I think Honda is onto something for the many buyers who
    buy a pickup truck as a style statement and/or for the occasional moderate
    duty job of picking up supplies for a bit of weekend gardening. The
    original poster is looking for a heavy duty truck for carry large loads up
    and down mountain passes. That is not the Ridgeline's design target.

    John
     
    John Horner, May 1, 2005
    #7
  8. Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!!

    SoCalMike Guest

    i think the OP knows this and is trolling.
     
    SoCalMike, May 1, 2005
    #8
  9. Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!!

    tony kujawa Guest


    F the overpriced Ridgeline. Go buy a 4x4 turbodiesel from one of the big 3
    for the same price if you watch your options. Same gas mileage and 600
    ft/lbs of tourqe in a real truck, not some toy.
     
    tony kujawa, May 3, 2005
    #9
  10. Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!!

    Kent Finnell Guest

    Well, I did a little home work and the Ridgeline RL (base model) does real
    well against the Ford Explorer Sport Trac 4x4and the Toyota Tacoma 4x4
    Double Cab V6 Automatic, similarly equipped.

    The RL is about the same price as the Ford ($28,215 vs 28,305). The Toyota
    is about $3,100 higher than either.

    The RL is lighter and has more horsepower than either of the other two, but
    the Toyota does have a torque advantage. The RL gets slightly better gas
    mileage. The Honda beats the other two like a drum in resale value.

    The RL has the advantage of greater interior space. Its bed length is only
    0.3 inches less than the Tacoma's while 10 inches greater than the Ford's!
    The bed width for each, respectively, is 20.7. 19.7, and 18.0 -- advantage,
    Honda.

    The maximum towing capacity for the RL is 5,000 lbs; 5,080 for the Explorer
    and 6,500 for the Toyota -- advantage Tacoma (but for 3 grand more?)

    Maximum payload for each -- 1,549, 1,480, and 1,405.

    The RL, even though the base model, comes with a lot of standard equipment
    that is either optional or not available on the other two.

    Here I've compared different types of apples, not apples and oranges. The
    Ridgeline is a medium weight AWD truck that can be used for work and
    shouldn't be compared to the Tundra or the Titan. I'm not sure what the
    Sport Trac is supposed to be, an SUV disguised as a truck or a truck trying
    to be an SUV. The Tacoma is comparable to the Ridgeline, IMO.

    The Dodge Dakota doesn't compare well with any of them, but the Nissan
    Frontier does.
     
    Kent Finnell, May 3, 2005
    #10
  11. Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!!

    John Horner Guest

    The Honda beats the other two like a drum in resale value.
    There is absolutely no way to know what the resale value of Ridgelines
    several years from now is going to be. It is a brand new model in a segment
    Honda has never been in before.

    John
     
    John Horner, May 4, 2005
    #11
  12. Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!!

    SoCalMike Guest

    since when did ridgelines cots $50k? thats what a 4x4 turdblowdiesel
    with all the goodies costs from one of the big 3. not american 3... just
    big 3. and theyre all made in mexico anyway.

    oh, wait... toyota is #2. hm. what turbodiesel do they offer?
     
    SoCalMike, May 4, 2005
    #12
  13. Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!!

    SoCalMike Guest

    ill agree with that. they might just be making the "subaru brat" of the
    new millineum.
     
    SoCalMike, May 4, 2005
    #13
  14. Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!!

    garray Guest

    Good stuff, Kent. A lot of info on the forum at Honda Ridgeline Owners Club
    too - www.ridgelineownersclub.com if you're looking for more from actual
    owners and how they're using the truck so far.
     
    garray, May 4, 2005
    #14
  15. Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!!

    Kent Finnell Guest

    It's a Honda and Expedition is a F (ix) O (r) R (epair) D (aily). Actually
    the Tacoma was the one without an estimated resale value. The Frontier is
    about on a par with the RL's estimated resale value. We won't even discuss
    the Dodge. I didn't look at the Avalanche ... too big and too heavy.

    Ok, excluding resale values, what about the other Ridgeline advantages?
    When similarly equipped it doesn't appear to be over priced (as one poster
    claimed). The interior is roomy, the 5 ft bed is the norm for the class
    with full size rear doors and seats. The bed is functionally wider since
    the wheel wells don't intrude on the bed area.

    Independent comparison test seem to favor the Ridgeline, at least the ones
    I've read. There's an admittedly biased one on www.vtec.net (hopefully it's
    still there). In any case, Honda has raised the bar in the class.

    Disclosure: I do not work for Honda or a Honda dealership. I've never
    owned a pickup nor do I want to own one.
     
    Kent Finnell, May 4, 2005
    #15
  16. Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!!

    tony kujawa Guest

    I said if you watch your options, $35K is attainable you retard.
     
    tony kujawa, May 6, 2005
    #16
  17. Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!!

    Kent Finnell Guest

    RT ................................... Starting MSRP $27,700
    RTS .................................. Starting MSRP $30,075
    RTL .................................. Starting MSRP $31,490
    RTL w/ Moonroof ............. Starting MSRP $32,640
    RTL w/ Moonroof & Nav .. Starting MSRP $34,640

    Add $515 for delivery. Only then does the MSRP go over $35k on the RTL w/
    Moonroof & Nav. Hog wild and pig crazy, loaded to the hilt $43,682 not
    counting accessory installation (deal with the dealer on that).

    Now the last is a Ridgeline trimmed to the hilt with a freaking moonroof
    which no "working" truck needs. The base RT is well trimmed. Let's compare
    apples to apples here, not apples to watermelons. Honda classifies the RL
    as a light truck and in no way should be compared to a honking turbodiesel.
    It's not built nor designed to compete with Hummers and Cummings Diesel
    powered 4x4s. It can hold its own with trucks in its class, V6 powered 4x4
    4 door Toyotas, Dodges, Nissans, Chevies, and Fords. You may not like it.
    If not, don't buy it. Quit trying to shove YOUR OPINION down everyone's
    throat, retard your own bad self.
     
    Kent Finnell, May 6, 2005
    #17
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.