protectionist b.s.

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by jim beam, Feb 3, 2010.

  1. jim beam

    jr92 Guest


    As, of today, in case anyone is counting, the number is 34, and
    growing almost daily.



    I don't take satisfaction in posting this, as I don't want to appear
    to be gloating over the deaths of humans.


    However, the number of deaths, along with the number of accidents due
    to stuck accelerators on Toyotas apperar to have been kept hidden for
    several years.



    The truth is just now coming out.


    And it ain't pretty.
     
    jr92, Feb 18, 2010
  2. jim beam

    Tony Harding Guest

    Right! Probably why GM went bankrupt and begged for billion of taxpayer
    (our!!!) $$$, don'tcha think?

    <yes this was a month ago - no need to point that out>
     
    Tony Harding, Mar 11, 2010
  3. jim beam

    jr92 Guest


    There are a lot of business reasons for GM's bankrupkcty, but NOT
    selling cars and trucks ain't one of them.

    Once again, I'll state this:

    They are selling cars by the millions.

    SOMEBODY is buying them.

    And these cars aren't suddenly accelerating out of control, having
    failing braking systems, rusting out of control, or being recalled
    more often than they are being sold, unlike a certain "king of
    quality" car company that is suddenly under fire, albeit about 20
    years later than it should have been.
     
    jr92, Mar 11, 2010
  4. jim beam

    jim beam Guest

    gm's overseas business is strong and dynamic. because they have a
    radically different approach to development. their domestic business
    sucks ass. because they try to sell the same old crap year after year.

    look at the numbers. they should bring the guy that runs their european
    [opel] operations over here and have him run the show.
     
    jim beam, Mar 11, 2010
  5. jim beam

    Clive Guest

    That must be why he's shutting the Belgium plant and is making a further
    7000 around Europe redundant then. (Sorry, you would call that
    "letting them go")
     
    Clive, Mar 11, 2010
  6. jim beam

    jim beam Guest

    well, if the sales aren't there, how can they keep people producing stuff?

    my point is, that guy runs a tight ship with market-appropriate product
    that sells. over here, they still sell garbage based on 1950's
    "technology", of terrible quality, and that the consumer doesn't like,
    all while pimping the taxpayer to keep their dumb asses stuck to that
    retarded formula. makes no sense. bring the germans over here - they
    know how to make cars, with local labor and components, and do so at a
    profit.
     
    jim beam, Mar 12, 2010
  7. jim beam

    Tony Harding Guest

    ROTFLMAO - you're much funnier that I first thought. :)

    Speaking of market share (of the US market, as I understand it), GM
    peaked at 54% in 1954. For 2008 it was 19%, a great sign of a well
    managed company selling well built products.

    Here's a chart:

    Year %
    1941 41
    1954 54
    1959 42
    1990 36
    2007 22
    2008 19

    and a URL

    http://www.forbes.com/2007/01/01/gm-market-share-oped-cz_jf_0102flint.html
     
    Tony Harding, Mar 15, 2010
  8. jim beam

    Tony Harding Guest

    Biased facts? You've gone off the deep end now.
     
    Tony Harding, Mar 15, 2010
  9. jim beam

    Tony Harding Guest

    To the previous poster, not Ed, is the Japanese govt so powerful it can
    restrict "the number of US cars allowed to be sold in the US"? Wow, I
    had no idea.
     
    Tony Harding, Mar 15, 2010
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
There are no similar threads yet.
Loading...