engage parking brake before shifting to park?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Tim Evans, Jun 1, 2004.

  1. Tim Evans

    Tim Evans Guest

    This is more a general automotive question, but I do own a Honda, so I
    thought I'd try it here.

    Growing up, my father always told me to engage the parking brake on a car
    with an automatic transmission while the car was still in drive or reverse
    (or even neutral) before shifting into park (of course, the car should be
    stopped). This was somehow supposed to "reduce the strain" on the
    transmission. So, is there really any good reason to do this?
     
    Tim Evans, Jun 1, 2004
    #1
  2. NO!.. If you are going to engage the parking brake then it should be done
    before removing your foot from the regular brake. The procedure would be to
    come to a stop, put in park (keeping foot on brake) and then engage the
    parking brake. The last thing that should be done is to remove foot from
    brake.

    Although not as important on a flat surface it is an excellent idea on any
    unlevel surface and a good practice to utilize at all times while parking.
    This reduces the stress on the parking pawl of the transmission. It is
    called a parking break for a reason.



    CaptainKrunch
     
    CaptainKrunch, Jun 1, 2004
    #2
  3. Tim Evans

    Brian Smith Guest

    In my opinion, it does reduce the strain put on the transmission. I have
    always placed the transmission in neutral, then applied the parking brake.
    Then put the transmission into the Park position, and finally, removed my
    foot from the service brake. That eliminates any movement of the vehicle
    when the service brake is released.
     
    Brian Smith, Jun 1, 2004
    #3
  4. Yes.

    Put the car into neutral, engage the parking brake, take your foot off
    the brake, and let the car settle into being held by the parking brake.

    THEN put it into park.

    The parking brake should be the primary method of holding the stress of
    the car. The transmission parking pawl should be only a backup to that.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Jun 1, 2004
    #4
  5. Tim Evans

    Tim Evans Guest

    I think I mis-stated the procedure in my original post. The procedure you
    describe is what I meant to describe.
     
    Tim Evans, Jun 1, 2004
    #5
  6. Tim Evans

    JXStern Guest

    Somewhere in here, we expect the car will come to a full stop?
     
    JXStern, Jun 2, 2004
    #6
  7. Somewhere in here, we expect the car will come to a full stop?[/QUOTE]

    I said to put the car into neutral, engage the parking brake, then take
    your foot off the brake. The car is in neutral, so the engine isn't
    driving it; the only thing driving it would be gravity.

    The mass of the car will settle into the parking brake, such that the
    parking brake takes up the strain--as it is designed to do.

    With the parking brake taking up the strain of the mass of the car, then
    take the transmission out of neutral and into park.

    This way, the parking pawl is not taking the strain of the mass of the
    car being pulled by gravity. The parking pawl becomes a backup, should
    the parking brake fail.

    So where in there didn't you read that the car comes to a stop? What
    part of "let the car settle into being held by the parking brake" didn't
    you understand?
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Jun 2, 2004
    #7
  8. Tim Evans

    JXStern Guest

    Just wondering if I should begin the sequence with the car moving over
    55mph.

    J.
     
    JXStern, Jun 3, 2004
    #8
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.